random notes

God Didn't Need A Beginning

By Babu G. Ranganathan

We've all asked the question from the age of 2. Why did the universe have a beginning but not God? If God didn't have a beginning why should the universe have a beginning. Couldn't the universe just have always existed? Why a need for God?

The answer is found in understanding why the universe had to have a beginning. Science supports Einstein's claim that the universe is a closed system. That means it has finite energy. Even though energy cannot be created or destroyed (by any natural processes), over time the useful energy in the universe becomes more and more useless. This is known in science as the Second Law of Thermodynamics. If the universe were eternal then all of the energy would have become totally useless by now and I wouldn't be writing this article and you wouldn't be reading it either!
...
This proves, as mentioned earlier, that the universe could not be eternal or otherwise it would have long ago reached this point of uniform energy decay or level.
...
All of this simply supports the belief that an intelligent power outside of nature and the universe was responsible for its origin and order.

... we don't really, unless we have an agenda ...
... or we may call god the simple "spiritual" process of telepathy ...
... linking unconscious information from different species ...
... e.g. the theory of axes ...
... or we may call god the universe or its driving forces themselves ...
... but this is just a semantic exercise ...
... at the bottom line whatever the "truth" is ...
... will always be more "true" than the "god" of the agenda ...
... nobody argues that "the truth" is "true" ...

... generally humans call god what is convenient to their agenda ...
... people who may not have an agenda ...
... can only approximate within limits ...
... "something" that is as omni-comprehensive as possible ...
... not because there may be any need, but just to understand the "holy" minds ...
... methods of reasoning ...

... the universe actually "is" the unified system, by definition ...
... now we just need another 2500 years to understand it ...

... "possibly" the universe is a closed system between a big bang and a big crunch ...
... within the same system as we can compute with "our" limit of space and time ...
... but the big crunches and the big bangs make it an open system ...
... so the problem is that it is "both" ...
... and there is no prove that the universe is not eternal, actually ...
... maybe "this" universe cycle, but not "the" universe ...

... would not dispose of "gravity" in such a simple manner ...
... and all this proves absolutely nothing "factually" and "empirically" ...
... besides a faulty method in the analysis ...